123

 

ISSN 0536-1028 (Print)              ISSN 2686-9853 (Online)  

Tagil'tsev S. N., Kibanova T. N. – The Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, the Russian Federation. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Geodynamic (tectonic) stress state of the upper part of the earth crust is manifested by the presence of the main normal
stresses, which, as a rule, exceed geostatic stresses from the rock weight. Extension zones form sections with the lower
bearing capacities in geological strata. From the perspective of hydrogeology, sections of extension are the most waterbearing;
they contribute to the formation of high filtration properties at the local section of rock massif. In the Urals, in case
of shears intersecting, extension zones usually occur in the northern and southern sectors, whereas the compression
zones, correspondingly, in the western and eastern sectors. In the field of modern tectonic stresses under the intersection
of multidirectional faults and the faults of various kinematic type, the zones of extension and compression may occur,
which should be studied to estimate the safety of the buildings and structures construction and exploitation, as well as to
search for the sections with higher filtration properties in rock massif for water supply. Modern fulfillment of the complex of
geophysical, geodetic, and hydrogeomechanical investigations at the stage of pioneering or at the initial operating period,
makes it possible to reveal the reasons for the possible deformations and, perhaps, save a building from destruction.

Key words: hydrogeomechanical structures; extension zones; compression zones; deformation of a building.

REFERENCES
1. Griaznov O. N. Inzhenerno-geologicheskie usloviia Urala [Engineering and geological conditions of the Urals].
Ekaterinburg, UrSMU Publ., 2017. 240 p.
2. Guliaev A. N. [Seismic activity of the Urals and surrounding areas]. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo
universiteta – News of the Ural State Mining University, 2016, issue 4(44), pp. 45–49. (In Russ.)
3. Tagil'tsev S. N., Luk'ianov A. E. [Geomechanical role of tectonic fractures and the regularities of their spatial
arrangement]. Geomekhanika v gornom dele: dokl. nauch.-tekhn. konf. (12–14 oktiabria 2011 g.) [Proc. Sci. Pract.
Conf. “Geomechanics in Mining” (October 12th–14th, 2011)]. Ekaterinburg, 2012, pp. 26–39. (In Russ.)
4. Tagil'tsev S. N. [The use of tectonic-physical analysis to estimate the hydrogeological role of fractures].
Tektonofizicheskie aspekty razlomoobrazovaniia v litosfere: tez. dokl. Vsesoiuz. soveshch. [Proc. All-Union Conf.
“Tectonic-physical aspects of faulting in the lithosphere”]. Irkutsk, 1990, pp. 169–170. (In Russ.)
5. Bachmanov D. M., Rasskazov A. A. [The activity of ruptures and some properties of geodynamics in the region of
Southern and Middle Urals connection]. Geotektonika – Geotectoniks, 2000, no. 4, pp. 25–31. (In Russ.)
6. Artiushkov E. V. Fizicheskaia tektonika [Physical tectonics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. 302 p.
7. Tkachuk E. I. Regular vertical changeability of rock massproperties of filtration. Proc. 6th Int. Congress IEAG. 1990,
vol. 2, pp. 1249–1252.
8. Varga A. A. Inzhenerno-tektonicheskii analiz skal'nykh massivov [Engineering and tectonic analysis of hard rock
massifs]. Moscow, Nedra Publ., 1998. 216 p.
9. Zoback M. L. First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the world stress map project. Journal of
Geophysical Research, 1992, vol. 97, no. B8, pp. 11761–11782.
10. Tagil'tsev S. N., Osipova A. Iu., Luk'ianov A. E. [Active tectonic structures and their exposure at the construction
sites]. Ural'skii stroitel' – The Ural Builder, 2012, no. 11–12, pp. 31–33. (In Russ.)
11. Borisevich D. V. [Neotectonics of the Urals]. Tektonicheskie dvizheniia i noveishie struktury zemnoi kory: mater.
soveshch. po problemam neotektoniki [Proc. Meeting on the Problems of Neotectonics “Tectonic movements and
the latest structures of the earth crust”]. Moscow, 1967, pp. 300–304. (In Russ.)
12. Griaznov O. N., Guliaev A. N., Savintsev I. A. [Engineering and geological conditions of Ekaterinburg as a basis
for the development of the Urban Development Master Plan]. Sergeevskie chteniia. Vyp. 17: mater. godichnoi sessii
Nauchnogo soveta RAN po problemam geoekologii, inzhenernoi geologii i gidrogeologii (19–20 marta 2015 g.) [Proc.
Annual session of RAS scientific board on the problems of geoecology, engineering geology, and hydrogeology (March
19th–20th, 2015). Issue 17]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2015, pp. 17–24. (In Russ.)

Language

E-mail

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Мы индексируемся в: